Windows 11 vs Ubuntu vs Fedora 39 vs Arch Linux - Speed Test!
Read full transcript 11 segments
-
in this video we are going to be running in this video we are going to be running benchmarks and speed tests of Windows benchmarks and speed tests of Windows benchmarks and speed tests of Windows versus Linux including everything from versus Linux including everything from versus Linux including everything from the boot speed test file transfer speeds the boot speed test file transfer speeds the boot speed test file transfer speeds synthetic benchmarks graphic tests and a synthetic benchmarks graphic tests and a synthetic benchmarks graphic tests and a whole lot more I've done videos like whole lot more I've done videos like whole lot more I've done videos like this with a variety of different this with a variety of different this with a variety of different machines but in the 2024 version today machines but in the 2024 version today machines but in the 2024 version today we are going to be using this laptop we are going to be using this laptop we are going to be using this laptop right here this is a laptop featuring right here this is a laptop featuring right here this is a laptop featuring the Intel n95 processor the n95 and N1 the Intel n95 processor the n95 and N1 the Intel n95 processor the n95 and N1 100s are basically the replacement to 100s are basically the replacement to 100s are basically the replacement to the int cerons primarily reason I chose the int cerons primarily reason I chose the int cerons primarily reason I chose this device is they are going to this device is they are going to this device is they are going to eventually be everywhere and one thing eventually be everywhere and one thing eventually be everywhere and one thing you'll notice and one thing we've you'll notice and one thing we've you'll notice and one thing we've noticed in previous videos is the better noticed in previous videos is the better noticed in previous videos is the better the hardware the less of an actual the hardware the less of an actual the hardware the less of an actual difference in the benchmarking so with difference in the benchmarking so with difference in the benchmarking so with this device we both get Modern Hardware this device we both get Modern Hardware this device we both get Modern Hardware and actual noticeable differences in and actual noticeable differences in and actual noticeable differences in some of these tests now the hardware is some of these tests now the hardware is some of these tests now the hardware is important but what is most important for important but what is most important for important but what is most important for this video is the actual software we are this video is the actual software we are this video is the actual software we are going to be testing and that is going to going to be testing and that is going to going to be testing and that is going to be windows we have a bluu 22.0 fored 39 be windows we have a bluu 22.0 fored 39 be windows we have a bluu 22.0 fored 39 and Endeavor OS I have all the software and Endeavor OS I have all the software and Endeavor OS I have all the software information here and there'll be a post information here and there'll be a post information here and there'll be a post down below with much more information if down below with much more information if down below with much more information if you're interested probably the most you're interested probably the most you're interested probably the most important thing both Ubuntu and Fedor important thing both Ubuntu and Fedor important thing both Ubuntu and Fedor are running the stock gnome environment are running the stock gnome environment are running the stock gnome environment and then Endeavor OS is running its and then Endeavor OS is running its and then Endeavor OS is running its stock which is going to be KD plasma and stock which is going to be KD plasma and stock which is going to be KD plasma and Endeavor OS is going to be kind of our Endeavor OS is going to be kind of our Endeavor OS is going to be kind of our fill in for Arch Linux but before we get fill in for Arch Linux but before we get fill in for Arch Linux but before we get onto the testing I do need to thank the onto the testing I do need to thank the onto the testing I do need to thank the sponsor of this video twin gate for sponsor of this video twin gate for sponsor of this video twin gate for making this possible twin gate makes a making this possible twin gate makes a making this possible twin gate makes a really easy to deploy a zero trust
-
really easy to deploy a zero trust really easy to deploy a zero trust Network so it makes it incredibly simple Network so it makes it incredibly simple Network so it makes it incredibly simple to connect to your local network from it to connect to your local network from it to connect to your local network from it just about anywhere in the world making just about anywhere in the world making just about anywhere in the world making a phenomenal local VPN replacement a phenomenal local VPN replacement a phenomenal local VPN replacement actually spinning it up is as simple as actually spinning it up is as simple as actually spinning it up is as simple as getting one of their connectors on getting one of their connectors on getting one of their connectors on either a local server NZ Raspberry Pi or either a local server NZ Raspberry Pi or either a local server NZ Raspberry Pi or really any hardware of your choice really any hardware of your choice really any hardware of your choice connecting that up with their online connecting that up with their online connecting that up with their online platform and you're good to go you can platform and you're good to go you can platform and you're good to go you can set up various resources you could add set up various resources you could add set up various resources you could add teams of people and give them Port teams of people and give them Port teams of people and give them Port specific ACC access to various services specific ACC access to various services specific ACC access to various services on your network whether that be a on your network whether that be a on your network whether that be a specific file server various web specific file server various web specific file server various web services networking tools DNS really services networking tools DNS really services networking tools DNS really anything they even have a really nice anything they even have a really nice anything they even have a really nice mobile app here that you can connect to mobile app here that you can connect to mobile app here that you can connect to and you can use single sign on in and you can use single sign on in and you can use single sign on in addition to setting up authorization addition to setting up authorization addition to setting up authorization keys for even more security for personal keys for even more security for personal keys for even more security for personal accounts it is completely free up to accounts it is completely free up to accounts it is completely free up to five users and I'll go ahead and post a five users and I'll go ahead and post a five users and I'll go ahead and post a link down below you use that link it link down below you use that link it link down below you use that link it helps out the channel of course so for helps out the channel of course so for helps out the channel of course so for this first group of tests these are the this first group of tests these are the this first group of tests these are the actual side by side speed tests I ran actual side by side speed tests I ran actual side by side speed tests I ran all these tests basically in the exact all these tests basically in the exact all these tests basically in the exact same conditions multiple times to make same conditions multiple times to make same conditions multiple times to make sure there were no big deviations and sure there were no big deviations and sure there were no big deviations and the scores and starting with the boot the scores and starting with the boot the scores and starting with the boot speed test firing up these machines speed test firing up these machines speed test firing up these machines starting the clock as soon as my finger starting the clock as soon as my finger starting the clock as soon as my finger releases from the button the first releases from the button the first releases from the button the first machine to drop us into the desktop was machine to drop us into the desktop was machine to drop us into the desktop was Ubuntu at 29 seconds followed up Ubuntu at 29 seconds followed up Ubuntu at 29 seconds followed up narrowly by Arch Linux at 30.5 seconds narrowly by Arch Linux at 30.5 seconds narrowly by Arch Linux at 30.5 seconds and then in third place we actually had and then in third place we actually had and then in third place we actually had windows at 34.7 seconds and then finally windows at 34.7 seconds and then finally windows at 34.7 seconds and then finally Fedora Linux booted up in
-
Fedora Linux booted up in Fedora Linux booted up in 35.2 seconds now if you're anything like 35.2 seconds now if you're anything like 35.2 seconds now if you're anything like me you probably restart your computer me you probably restart your computer me you probably restart your computer more than you shut it down so I was more than you shut it down so I was more than you shut it down so I was curious what going to restart quicker curious what going to restart quicker curious what going to restart quicker now when it comes to the restart speed now when it comes to the restart speed now when it comes to the restart speed it was basically the same order but it was basically the same order but it was basically the same order but there was some key differences ubu went there was some key differences ubu went there was some key differences ubu went ahead and restarted in 36.4 seconds ahead and restarted in 36.4 seconds ahead and restarted in 36.4 seconds followed up really closely by Arch Linux followed up really closely by Arch Linux followed up really closely by Arch Linux at 37.9 seconds and then a few seconds at 37.9 seconds and then a few seconds at 37.9 seconds and then a few seconds later at 41 seconds of Buu fire it up later at 41 seconds of Buu fire it up later at 41 seconds of Buu fire it up and then a whole and then a whole and then a whole 56.4 seconds is what it took Fedora to 56.4 seconds is what it took Fedora to 56.4 seconds is what it took Fedora to do that complete reboot now that we're do that complete reboot now that we're do that complete reboot now that we're in the system one of the very first in the system one of the very first in the system one of the very first things that I did was update all of the things that I did was update all of the things that I did was update all of the systems to their latest version as of systems to their latest version as of systems to their latest version as of the date of recording once completely up the date of recording once completely up the date of recording once completely up to date I went to see what system was to date I went to see what system was to date I went to see what system was using the most storage or well what using the most storage or well what using the most storage or well what system was giving me the most available system was giving me the most available system was giving me the most available storage usable by me and in this case storage usable by me and in this case storage usable by me and in this case Fedora definitely gave me the most at 54 Fedora definitely gave me the most at 54 Fedora definitely gave me the most at 54 GB followed up by Ubuntu at 400 62 GB GB followed up by Ubuntu at 400 62 GB GB followed up by Ubuntu at 400 62 GB and then we had windows with 440 GB of and then we had windows with 440 GB of and then we had windows with 440 GB of usable space and then at least in this usable space and then at least in this usable space and then at least in this case the least available space was Arch case the least available space was Arch case the least available space was Arch Linux at Linux at Linux at 435 GB now I will note and you will 435 GB now I will note and you will 435 GB now I will note and you will probably also know if you install just probably also know if you install just probably also know if you install just base Arch Linux and put only the stuff base Arch Linux and put only the stuff base Arch Linux and put only the stuff you need on it it won't be nearly as you need on it it won't be nearly as you need on it it won't be nearly as bloated as an Endeavor us install so do bloated as an Endeavor us install so do bloated as an Endeavor us install so do take this result with a grain of salt take this result with a grain of salt take this result with a grain of salt next up we had the file transfer speed next up we had the file transfer speed next up we had the file transfer speed test this right here is the US USB test this right here is the US USB test this right here is the US USB device that I used this one's a little device that I used this one's a little device that I used this one's a little unique it's USBC but it actually has a
-
unique it's USBC but it actually has a unique it's USBC but it actually has a removable mvme SSD in here so pretty removable mvme SSD in here so pretty removable mvme SSD in here so pretty cool on this thing I just had over 17 GB cool on this thing I just had over 17 GB cool on this thing I just had over 17 GB worth of files to go ahead and transfer worth of files to go ahead and transfer worth of files to go ahead and transfer I had all of the open mapping data for I had all of the open mapping data for I had all of the open mapping data for Australia as well as Steamboat Willie in Australia as well as Steamboat Willie in Australia as well as Steamboat Willie in a folder of one of my favorite TV shows a folder of one of my favorite TV shows a folder of one of my favorite TV shows now copy and pasting that to the now copy and pasting that to the now copy and pasting that to the documents folder was done the quickest documents folder was done the quickest documents folder was done the quickest in Arch Linux at 47.2 seconds followed in Arch Linux at 47.2 seconds followed in Arch Linux at 47.2 seconds followed up by ubun 48.3 and then Fedora at 49.3 up by ubun 48.3 and then Fedora at 49.3 up by ubun 48.3 and then Fedora at 49.3 and then lastly windows at 53 seconds to and then lastly windows at 53 seconds to and then lastly windows at 53 seconds to transfer just about 17 GB of files from transfer just about 17 GB of files from transfer just about 17 GB of files from this device now from there since I this device now from there since I this device now from there since I transferred over Steamboat Willie and I transferred over Steamboat Willie and I transferred over Steamboat Willie and I can actually show it on screen I decided can actually show it on screen I decided can actually show it on screen I decided to render it out in K in live at its to render it out in K in live at its to render it out in K in live at its default settings and when performing default settings and when performing default settings and when performing this test we actually saw Fedora blow this test we actually saw Fedora blow this test we actually saw Fedora blow everything out of the water with a everything out of the water with a everything out of the water with a result of 1 minute it took to render result of 1 minute it took to render result of 1 minute it took to render this out that was followed up by Arch this out that was followed up by Arch this out that was followed up by Arch linkx at a minute and 48 seconds and linkx at a minute and 48 seconds and linkx at a minute and 48 seconds and then ubu at a minute and 49 seconds and then ubu at a minute and 49 seconds and then ubu at a minute and 49 seconds and then after that Windows was definitely then after that Windows was definitely then after that Windows was definitely the slowest at 2 minutes and 20 seconds the slowest at 2 minutes and 20 seconds the slowest at 2 minutes and 20 seconds so from there we have some pretty basic so from there we have some pretty basic so from there we have some pretty basic app opening tests just to see if there's app opening tests just to see if there's app opening tests just to see if there's any significant differences for some of any significant differences for some of any significant differences for some of these I did lower the speed of the these I did lower the speed of the these I did lower the speed of the footage to about half speed because it footage to about half speed because it footage to about half speed because it they all open up pretty quick with they all open up pretty quick with they all open up pretty quick with Firefox launching the quickest on Arch Firefox launching the quickest on Arch Firefox launching the quickest on Arch Linux followed up by Fedora and then it Linux followed up by Fedora and then it Linux followed up by Fedora and then it was nearly tied with Windows and Ubuntu was nearly tied with Windows and Ubuntu was nearly tied with Windows and Ubuntu next I opened up another browser next I opened up another browser next I opened up another browser Microsoft Edge and in this case it was Microsoft Edge and in this case it was Microsoft Edge and in this case it was a little bit more in Windows favor a little bit more in Windows favor a little bit more in Windows favor windows and Arch were tied to open up
-
windows and Arch were tied to open up windows and Arch were tied to open up this application with actually Arch this application with actually Arch this application with actually Arch loading the quickest when it comes to loading the quickest when it comes to loading the quickest when it comes to the elements on the actual home screen the elements on the actual home screen the elements on the actual home screen and then the btu Andor basically on par and then the btu Andor basically on par and then the btu Andor basically on par when it comes to loading those home when it comes to loading those home when it comes to loading those home screen elements next up we have lib screen elements next up we have lib screen elements next up we have lib office writer now this is going to be a office writer now this is going to be a office writer now this is going to be a clear Linux when we had clear Linux when we had clear Linux when we had archor to open it up and it took Windows archor to open it up and it took Windows archor to open it up and it took Windows quite a while to open up now this isn't quite a while to open up now this isn't quite a while to open up now this isn't necessarily the fault of Windows if we necessarily the fault of Windows if we necessarily the fault of Windows if we open up something like Microsoft Word open up something like Microsoft Word open up something like Microsoft Word and that filled that and instead of and that filled that and instead of and that filled that and instead of writer it would probably be just as writer it would probably be just as writer it would probably be just as quick when it comes to applications like quick when it comes to applications like quick when it comes to applications like lib office writer or even like a is lib office writer or even like a is lib office writer or even like a is another example it takes Windows a another example it takes Windows a another example it takes Windows a little bit longer to load all the little bit longer to load all the little bit longer to load all the libraries that the application requires libraries that the application requires libraries that the application requires in which with Linux it's they're all on in which with Linux it's they're all on in which with Linux it's they're all on the system and much more easy to access the system and much more easy to access the system and much more easy to access from there we went ahead and opened up from there we went ahead and opened up from there we went ahead and opened up Kaden live and this one definitely did Kaden live and this one definitely did Kaden live and this one definitely did open the fastest on Arch Linux open the fastest on Arch Linux open the fastest on Arch Linux borderline instantaneously and then borderline instantaneously and then borderline instantaneously and then windows and obuntu were pretty close but windows and obuntu were pretty close but windows and obuntu were pretty close but Fedor did lag slightly behind so now the Fedor did lag slightly behind so now the Fedor did lag slightly behind so now the battery test for this what I did is I battery test for this what I did is I battery test for this what I did is I installed Microsoft Edge for everyone installed Microsoft Edge for everyone installed Microsoft Edge for everyone it's going to be the flat pack I turned it's going to be the flat pack I turned it's going to be the flat pack I turned off all of the settings that would dim off all of the settings that would dim off all of the settings that would dim or shut off the screen and I full or shut off the screen and I full or shut off the screen and I full screened it put the YouTube video in screened it put the YouTube video in screened it put the YouTube video in theater mode set it to 720p the video I theater mode set it to 720p the video I theater mode set it to 720p the video I used was the 10hour loop of crab Rave used was the 10hour loop of crab Rave used was the 10hour loop of crab Rave hooked it up to my capture card and just hooked it up to my capture card and just hooked it up to my capture card and just ran it until it died making sure that ran it until it died making sure that ran it until it died making sure that everything had the same brightness level everything had the same brightness level everything had the same brightness level and all that and and in this case the and all that and and in this case the and all that and and in this case the best battery life was given to Fedora best battery life was given to Fedora best battery life was given to Fedora running 3 hours and 6 minutes on this
-
running 3 hours and 6 minutes on this running 3 hours and 6 minutes on this specific device that was followed up specific device that was followed up specific device that was followed up closely by Arch Linux at 3 hours and 2 closely by Arch Linux at 3 hours and 2 closely by Arch Linux at 3 hours and 2 minutes and then that was followed up by minutes and then that was followed up by minutes and then that was followed up by Ubuntu at 2 hours and 56 minutes and Ubuntu at 2 hours and 56 minutes and Ubuntu at 2 hours and 56 minutes and then just lagging slightly behind was then just lagging slightly behind was then just lagging slightly behind was windows at 2 hours and 51 minutes so windows at 2 hours and 51 minutes so windows at 2 hours and 51 minutes so from there we are now going to dive into from there we are now going to dive into from there we are now going to dive into the wonderful world of synthetic EDG the wonderful world of synthetic EDG the wonderful world of synthetic EDG marks these give us a nice score based marks these give us a nice score based marks these give us a nice score based on a particular test to kind of see some on a particular test to kind of see some on a particular test to kind of see some of the differences in our systems and of the differences in our systems and of the differences in our systems and for our very first test we ran kind of a for our very first test we ran kind of a for our very first test we ran kind of a generic all encompassing test and I will generic all encompassing test and I will generic all encompassing test and I will knowe most of these tests will be linked knowe most of these tests will be linked knowe most of these tests will be linked down below this geekbench one for sure down below this geekbench one for sure down below this geekbench one for sure geekbench is a all-around performance geekbench is a all-around performance geekbench is a all-around performance Benchmark that tests both the single Benchmark that tests both the single Benchmark that tests both the single core and multi-core performance here we core and multi-core performance here we core and multi-core performance here we can see all of our results are single can see all of our results are single can see all of our results are single and multi-core performance and we could and multi-core performance and we could and multi-core performance and we could see across the board the winner of the see across the board the winner of the see across the board the winner of the general performance Benchmark is going general performance Benchmark is going general performance Benchmark is going to be Arch Linux with a multicore score to be Arch Linux with a multicore score to be Arch Linux with a multicore score above 3,000 and a single core score at above 3,000 and a single core score at above 3,000 and a single core score at 1,268 utu was followed up really close 1,268 utu was followed up really close 1,268 utu was followed up really close just under 3,000 for the multicore and just under 3,000 for the multicore and just under 3,000 for the multicore and 1240 for single and then we could see 1240 for single and then we could see 1240 for single and then we could see here at least on this General Benchmark here at least on this General Benchmark here at least on this General Benchmark Windows did fall in last place at Windows did fall in last place at Windows did fall in last place at 1189 for the single core score and 1189 for the single core score and 1189 for the single core score and 2844 for the multi-core score now from 2844 for the multi-core score now from 2844 for the multi-core score now from there I did did a quick graphical test I there I did did a quick graphical test I there I did did a quick graphical test I will note these laptops are not gaming will note these laptops are not gaming will note these laptops are not gaming devices if you try to use them for devices if you try to use them for devices if you try to use them for gaming you're probably not going to have gaming you're probably not going to have gaming you're probably not going to have that great of time you might be able to
-
that great of time you might be able to that great of time you might be able to play some retro gaming some light play some retro gaming some light play some retro gaming some light emulation but other than that I wouldn't emulation but other than that I wouldn't emulation but other than that I wouldn't recommend it regardless I ran U engine recommend it regardless I ran U engine recommend it regardless I ran U engine Heaven Benchmark set to 720p high and in Heaven Benchmark set to 720p high and in Heaven Benchmark set to 720p high and in this case this is where we get our first this case this is where we get our first this case this is where we get our first Windows dub an absolute dub mind you Windows dub an absolute dub mind you Windows dub an absolute dub mind you with openg GL performance scored at 577 with openg GL performance scored at 577 with openg GL performance scored at 577 the next best was Arch Linux at 524 and the next best was Arch Linux at 524 and the next best was Arch Linux at 524 and then Ubuntu barely missed the 500 point then Ubuntu barely missed the 500 point then Ubuntu barely missed the 500 point mark and Fedora actually kind of fell mark and Fedora actually kind of fell mark and Fedora actually kind of fell behind this at behind this at behind this at 466 Windows does have directx11 I tested 466 Windows does have directx11 I tested 466 Windows does have directx11 I tested that and it scored basically on par with that and it scored basically on par with that and it scored basically on par with their opengl score this one at 575 so their opengl score this one at 575 so their opengl score this one at 575 so now we are probably going to go into one now we are probably going to go into one now we are probably going to go into one of the very best benchmarking platforms of the very best benchmarking platforms of the very best benchmarking platforms and that is open Benchmark granted it is and that is open Benchmark granted it is and that is open Benchmark granted it is the best in my opinion but for some the best in my opinion but for some the best in my opinion but for some reason not all my results were reason not all my results were reason not all my results were successfully uploaded successfully uploaded successfully uploaded so they were able to provide some graphs so they were able to provide some graphs so they were able to provide some graphs and I had to make some of my own because and I had to make some of my own because and I had to make some of my own because it all wasn't uploaded properly with it all wasn't uploaded properly with it all wasn't uploaded properly with that said the very first bench rean was that said the very first bench rean was that said the very first bench rean was crafty this is an open- Source chess crafty this is an open- Source chess crafty this is an open- Source chess engine helping us measure CPU engine helping us measure CPU engine helping us measure CPU performance this is done in nodes per performance this is done in nodes per performance this is done in nodes per second and we can see the chart here in second and we can see the chart here in second and we can see the chart here in this case the more is going to be better this case the more is going to be better this case the more is going to be better and we have Fedor definitely getting and we have Fedor definitely getting and we have Fedor definitely getting more at 7.8 million U and Archer pretty more at 7.8 million U and Archer pretty more at 7.8 million U and Archer pretty close with Arch taking a slight ADV close with Arch taking a slight ADV close with Arch taking a slight ADV antigen then last place we have windows antigen then last place we have windows antigen then last place we have windows at 7.1 million nodes per second from at 7.1 million nodes per second from at 7.1 million nodes per second from there we ran a test called Cay this is a there we ran a test called Cay this is a there we ran a test called Cay this is a simple Ray Tracer designed to test the
-
simple Ray Tracer designed to test the simple Ray Tracer designed to test the floating Point CPU performance and floating Point CPU performance and floating Point CPU performance and unlike the previous test this one is unlike the previous test this one is unlike the previous test this one is measured in seconds and the fewer or the measured in seconds and the fewer or the measured in seconds and the fewer or the shortest amount of time is going to be a shortest amount of time is going to be a shortest amount of time is going to be a better score this one was a lot closer better score this one was a lot closer better score this one was a lot closer but we did have a clear winner auntu but we did have a clear winner auntu but we did have a clear winner auntu here scored a here scored a here scored a 256 while everything else scored 265 256 while everything else scored 265 256 while everything else scored 265 with Windows actually uh getting just a with Windows actually uh getting just a with Windows actually uh getting just a barely slight advantage over barely slight advantage over barely slight advantage over Fedora and Arch Linux next we have a Fedora and Arch Linux next we have a Fedora and Arch Linux next we have a memory test this is going to be cash memory test this is going to be cash memory test this is going to be cash bench this is designed to test the bench this is designed to test the bench this is designed to test the memory and cash bandwidth performance memory and cash bandwidth performance memory and cash bandwidth performance and in this test and the next view we and in this test and the next view we and in this test and the next view we might see some clear um Linux advantages might see some clear um Linux advantages might see some clear um Linux advantages this one is more the better this is this one is more the better this is this one is more the better this is measured in megabytes per second this is measured in megabytes per second this is measured in megabytes per second this is the read WR modify test the read WR modify test the read WR modify test and we can see here the winners in and we can see here the winners in and we can see here the winners in reverse order we have Arch Fedora and reverse order we have Arch Fedora and reverse order we have Arch Fedora and Ubuntu all hovering in about Ubuntu all hovering in about Ubuntu all hovering in about 74,000 and then we have Windows behind 74,000 and then we have Windows behind 74,000 and then we have Windows behind just under 50,000 next up is PHP bench just under 50,000 next up is PHP bench just under 50,000 next up is PHP bench this is a whole Benchmark suite for PHP this is a whole Benchmark suite for PHP this is a whole Benchmark suite for PHP this performs a large number of simple this performs a large number of simple this performs a large number of simple tests in order to bench various aspects tests in order to bench various aspects tests in order to bench various aspects of the PHP interpreter this one is of the PHP interpreter this one is of the PHP interpreter this one is another definite Linux Advantage but another definite Linux Advantage but another definite Linux Advantage but this case there were some big this case there were some big this case there were some big differences between some of the differences between some of the differences between some of the distributions this one is a score so the distributions this one is a score so the distributions this one is a score so the more is better and the highest scoring more is better and the highest scoring more is better and the highest scoring one is Ubuntu at 757 or one is Ubuntu at 757 or one is Ubuntu at 757 or 77,000 followed up by Fedora at 732 rjet
-
77,000 followed up by Fedora at 732 rjet 77,000 followed up by Fedora at 732 rjet 607 and then windows at 373 ultimately 607 and then windows at 373 ultimately 607 and then windows at 373 ultimately there's a reason why Linux is the there's a reason why Linux is the there's a reason why Linux is the preferred platform of most servers in preferred platform of most servers in preferred platform of most servers in the world now let's switch over from PHP the world now let's switch over from PHP the world now let's switch over from PHP to python this test reports the average to python this test reports the average to python this test reports the average test times for different functions such test times for different functions such test times for different functions such as the built-in function calls and as the built-in function calls and as the built-in function calls and nested for loops with a total result nested for loops with a total result nested for loops with a total result giving you a rough estimate of how a giving you a rough estimate of how a giving you a rough estimate of how a system will perform with python this system will perform with python this system will perform with python this test is in milliseconds so the fewer the test is in milliseconds so the fewer the test is in milliseconds so the fewer the better and we had an arch dub Arch better and we had an arch dub Arch better and we had an arch dub Arch coming in at 94 milliseconds followed up coming in at 94 milliseconds followed up coming in at 94 milliseconds followed up by Ubuntu then Fedora both really close by Ubuntu then Fedora both really close by Ubuntu then Fedora both really close and then we have windows at and then we have windows at and then we have windows at 1,500 milliseconds so the next test I 1,500 milliseconds so the next test I 1,500 milliseconds so the next test I ran was called t- test one this is a ran was called t- test one this is a ran was called t- test one this is a basic memory allocator Benchmark this basic memory allocator Benchmark this basic memory allocator Benchmark this test is in seconds so the fewer the test is in seconds so the fewer the test is in seconds so the fewer the better and the best performer was Ubuntu better and the best performer was Ubuntu better and the best performer was Ubuntu followed up by Fedora and then closely followed up by Fedora and then closely followed up by Fedora and then closely behind that was Arch and then finally behind that was Arch and then finally behind that was Arch and then finally windows at 42 seconds just under double windows at 42 seconds just under double windows at 42 seconds just under double the speed difference there was a single the speed difference there was a single the speed difference there was a single thread and a dual thread test you can thread and a dual thread test you can thread and a dual thread test you can see the performance here is a little bit see the performance here is a little bit see the performance here is a little bit quicker but we basically have similar quicker but we basically have similar quicker but we basically have similar results in this case Arch and abutu results in this case Arch and abutu results in this case Arch and abutu almost tied up followed by Fedora and almost tied up followed by Fedora and almost tied up followed by Fedora and then window at 17 seconds compared to then window at 17 seconds compared to then window at 17 seconds compared to the 8.4 Linux average finally I ran a 7 the 8.4 Linux average finally I ran a 7 the 8.4 Linux average finally I ran a 7 zip compression test this is measured in zip compression test this is measured in zip compression test this is measured in myips so the more the better and this myips so the more the better and this myips so the more the better and this test didn't have it as dramatic of a
-
test didn't have it as dramatic of a test didn't have it as dramatic of a performance difference we could see on performance difference we could see on performance difference we could see on the compression rating Windows did fall the compression rating Windows did fall the compression rating Windows did fall slightly behind Arch did the best out of slightly behind Arch did the best out of slightly behind Arch did the best out of everything at about 17,500 with windows everything at about 17,500 with windows everything at about 17,500 with windows at at at 17,300 and then the decompression test 17,300 and then the decompression test 17,300 and then the decompression test was a little bit tighter with again Arch was a little bit tighter with again Arch was a little bit tighter with again Arch coming in Victorious at 12,000 2 200 and coming in Victorious at 12,000 2 200 and coming in Victorious at 12,000 2 200 and windows coming in at about windows coming in at about windows coming in at about 11,800 now this very last test doesn't 11,800 now this very last test doesn't 11,800 now this very last test doesn't have a Windows component but since I was have a Windows component but since I was have a Windows component but since I was running all these I was kind of running all these I was kind of running all these I was kind of interested how quickly can these interested how quickly can these interested how quickly can these operating systems compile the Linux operating systems compile the Linux operating systems compile the Linux kernel this was in seconds so the fewer kernel this was in seconds so the fewer kernel this was in seconds so the fewer the better and in this case BTU had a the better and in this case BTU had a the better and in this case BTU had a clear advantage in curdle compiling at clear advantage in curdle compiling at clear advantage in curdle compiling at 429 seconds versus Fedora at 522 seconds 429 seconds versus Fedora at 522 seconds 429 seconds versus Fedora at 522 seconds and Arch Linux at and Arch Linux at and Arch Linux at 561 seconds so ultimately what came can 561 seconds so ultimately what came can 561 seconds so ultimately what came can we actually take from all this data if we actually take from all this data if we actually take from all this data if we look at all the raw numbers and we we look at all the raw numbers and we we look at all the raw numbers and we don't consider anything else if you're don't consider anything else if you're don't consider anything else if you're going to run a server use Linux if you going to run a server use Linux if you going to run a server use Linux if you want to do any kind of rendering or want to do any kind of rendering or want to do any kind of rendering or super heavy tasks use Linux if you want super heavy tasks use Linux if you want super heavy tasks use Linux if you want the game you might want to use Windows the game you might want to use Windows the game you might want to use Windows but of course this is incredibly but of course this is incredibly but of course this is incredibly subjective depending on your use cases subjective depending on your use cases subjective depending on your use cases and just looking at the numbers really and just looking at the numbers really and just looking at the numbers really doesn't matter because let's say Linux doesn't matter because let's say Linux doesn't matter because let's say Linux can render things slightly faster but if can render things slightly faster but if can render things slightly faster but if you need to render things in an adobe you need to render things in an adobe you need to render things in an adobe product well you're going to have to use product well you're going to have to use product well you're going to have to use Windows anyways and if you're rendering Windows anyways and if you're rendering Windows anyways and if you're rendering things you're probably not going to be things you're probably not going to be things you're probably not going to be using a little machine like this you're using a little machine like this you're using a little machine like this you're probably going to have a much higher end probably going to have a much higher end probably going to have a much higher end machine in which the actual performance
-
machine in which the actual performance machine in which the actual performance results become a lot tighter and more results become a lot tighter and more results become a lot tighter and more and more irrelevant as the machine gets and more irrelevant as the machine gets and more irrelevant as the machine gets more powerful at least that's what we more powerful at least that's what we more powerful at least that's what we have seen in some of our previous have seen in some of our previous have seen in some of our previous testing if you're going to build a lower testing if you're going to build a lower testing if you're going to build a lower end or low power consuming server for end or low power consuming server for end or low power consuming server for some sort of service put it Windows some sort of service put it Windows some sort of service put it Windows audit would frankly be silly if a audit would frankly be silly if a audit would frankly be silly if a machine has to work slightly harder to machine has to work slightly harder to machine has to work slightly harder to use whatever software or service you're use whatever software or service you're use whatever software or service you're wanting to run that can add up pennies wanting to run that can add up pennies wanting to run that can add up pennies by pennies into just being more by pennies into just being more by pennies into just being more expensive on your power BT now of course expensive on your power BT now of course expensive on your power BT now of course these are my tests running my not so these are my tests running my not so these are my tests running my not so scientific environment the results scientific environment the results scientific environment the results probably aren't going to be exactly probably aren't going to be exactly probably aren't going to be exactly perfect I did try to keep the variables perfect I did try to keep the variables perfect I did try to keep the variables the same run all the tests in the same the same run all the tests in the same the same run all the tests in the same order in similar time frames I'm curious order in similar time frames I'm curious order in similar time frames I'm curious leave a comment down below do you notice leave a comment down below do you notice leave a comment down below do you notice any significant performance differences any significant performance differences any significant performance differences when you switch operating systems or when you switch operating systems or when you switch operating systems or platforms on the same Hardware that platforms on the same Hardware that platforms on the same Hardware that would definitely be interesting to know would definitely be interesting to know would definitely be interesting to know and of course everything I mentioned or and of course everything I mentioned or and of course everything I mentioned or everything I talked about in this video everything I talked about in this video everything I talked about in this video is going to be linked down below and is going to be linked down below and is going to be linked down below and yeah I hope you enjoyed this video have yeah I hope you enjoyed this video have yeah I hope you enjoyed this video have a beautiful day and goodbye
Summary
This video conducts benchmarks comparing Windows and Linux performance, focusing on boot times, file transfers, synthetic tests, and graphics on modern Intel N95 hardware. It highlights the importance of software configuration, specifically testing Windows with BlueZ, Fedora, and Ubuntu with GNOME, and Endeavor OS with KDE Plasma as an Arch Linux stand-in. The practical takeaway is that while hardware matters, actual software differences can be revealed through these comprehensive tests.